Search Engine Optimization News and Updates Search Engine Marketing For Google, Yahoo and Bing

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Top Hosting Companies World Wide

March 2nd, 2010 seotrade Posted in Domains Comments Off

I never knew how gigantic WildWestDomains.com was! Holy Cow!

Top Hosting Companies World Wide

Rank Hosting Company Country Market Share Total Domains
1 WILDWESTDOMAINS.COM United States 23.1196 % 25,619,520
2 ENOM.COM United States 3.1741 % 3,517,294
3 NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM United States 2.5882 % 2,868,056
4 ONEANDONE.COM United States 2.3398 % 2,592,854
5 YAHOO.COM United States 1.946 % 2,156,401
6 SEDOPARKING.COM Germany 1.6618 % 1,841,488
7 DSREDIRECTION.COM United States 1.5108 % 1,674,117
8 REGISTER.COM United States 1.3662 % 1,513,975
9 XINNET.COM China 0.9659 % 1,070,386
10 ABOVE.COM Australia 0.9065 % 1,004,522
11 DREAMHOST.COM United States 0.8718 % 966,049
12 BLUEHOST.COM United States 0.8639 % 957,262
13 HOSTGATOR.COM United States 0.8549 % 947,391
14 BUYDOMAINS.COM United States 0.8339 % 924,023
15 OVH.NET France 0.762 % 844,404
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Why Keywords In Your URL Are Important To Your Google Rank

September 8th, 2009 seotrade Posted in Domains, Google News, SEO 101 Comments Off

Does Google care about the position of a web page on your server? Does it make a difference if a web page is in the root directory of your website or in a sub directory? How does your URL structure influence the position of your web pages in Google’s search results?

Trailing slashes and sub directories

A popular assumption is that Google prefers pages that are in the root directory of a website.

If an URL contains many trailing slashes (meaning the page is placed in a sub-sub-directory) then Google might not think that the page is important in relation to the other pages.

Although this statement is often repeated in SEO forums, it is probably not true.

The visibility of a web page counts, not its position

If a web page is linked throughout your website and if the page has inbound links then the web page will be indexed and ranked by Google without any problems.

Most web pages on today’s websites are created dynamically and the URL that is displayed in a web browser presents only a virtual site structure that is not really available on the server.

As there are no real folders on the server, search engines won’t find a valuable ranking signal if they look at things like presence or absence of directories.

What does this mean for your website?

If you want to show search engines that a page on your website is important, link to it from many other pages of your website so that it can easily be found.

A page that gets many links (both from your own website and from other websites) will get the attention that it deserves from Google’s indexing robot.

When you should care about the structure of your URLs

1. URL stripping can cause problems

Rumor has it that Google uses URL stripping to index web pages. That means that Google shortens the path to an URL to find new pages on a site. For example, www.example.com/folder/keyword.htm would be shortened to www.example.com/folder/“.

If you use dynamically created URLs then you should make sure that all virtual folders return real web pages a “404 not found” pages. Otherwise, Google might think that you have many faulty pages and/or that your website has a low quality.

2. Shorter URLs can be better for your website visitors

Although most web surfers don’t pay attention to the URL in the browser address bar, shorter URLs can enhance the user experience. Shorter URLs are easier to remember and they can improve the direct type-in traffic.

3. Short URLs get more clicks

A search marketing study found out that web surfers clicked short URLs twice as often as long URLs in Google’s search results. Long URLs are cut off in Google search engine result pages. Web surfers cannot see where they are going to go and this can decrease the click-through rate.

4. The URLs of your web pages can contain your keywords

The words that appear in the URL of a web page can influence the position of the web page for these words. For that reason, it can make sense to rewrite your URLs so that they include the keywords for which you want to have high rankings.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

“Domain tasters” bitter as new fees put an end to their games

August 18th, 2009 seotrade Posted in Domains, SEO TOP NEWS Comments Off

icann_logo.jpg“Domain tasters” take advantage of a five-day domain name grace period to perform risk-free cybersquatting. Since ICANN upped the penalty for excessive cancellations, however, the practice has essentially disappeared.

Never ones to let a good deed go unpunished, scammers quickly learned to take advantage of a user-friendly policy that allowed a misregistered domain name—perhaps due to a typo—to be withdrawn at no cost. Scammers used this “Add Grace Period” to grab huge numbers of domains, throw up pages full of advertising, then withdraw the applications before the bill came due.

It was a practice known as “domain tasting,” and it gave the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) a bad case of indigestion. ICANN, which manages domain name assignments, ultimately responded by imposing penalties that would ensure any group that performed an excessive number of these premature withdrawals wound up with a substantial bill. Ina report on the results of the new policy, released yesterday, ICANN announced that its actions have essentially eliminated the delicious art of domain tasting.

Money for nothing

Domain tasters managed to make money with the practice, which essentially cost them nothing, in several ways. By registering variants of some domain name in bulk, it would be possible to direct them all to a simple webpage that harvested revenue from advertising services (Google, for example, acted to block the practice around the same time ICANN did). These could be used to quickly grab users looking for something related to a current event, or to sample a wide range of typos for a popular site; any names with staying power could be kept, while the rest could be discarded after a few days at no cost.

An alternate approach was to track users as they searched for the availability of different domain names, then register anything they considered. If the user ultimately tried to register one, the domain taster could offer to part with the one they’d registered at an inflated price; if nothing happened in a few days, the name was returned.

None of this was very seemly, and it created an added burden for the domain management system. Ultimately, the practice attracted a class action lawsuit.

In 2008, ICANN decided to act. It allowed domain registrars to withdraw as many as 10 percent of their total registrations; they would face penalties for anything above that. Initially, ICANN adopted a budget that included a charge of $0.20 for each withdrawal above the limit, which was in effect from June 2008 to July of this year. Later, it adopted an official policy that raised the penalty to $6.75, the cost of a .org registration; that took effect in July 2009.

The results have been dramatic. Even under the low-cost budget provisions, domain withdrawals during the grace period dropped to 16 percent of what they had been prior to its adoption. Once the heavy penalties took hold, the withdrawal rate dropped to under half a percent. Essentially, as the report’s title states, we’ve seen “the end of domain tasting.”

One of the unfortunate aspects of networked computing is that the cost of antisocial behaviors is so small (especially if you have access to a botnet) that it’s easy to profit from activities that make the Internet a less pleasant place. It’s nice to see that ICANN has figured out how to make one of these behaviors unprofitable, but it will be difficult or impossible to apply this model to many other unpleasant scams… or spams.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button